The Legacy Of Slavery
BY RAMONA GARNES
Wanted: Energetic, live-in nanny / housekeeper to work full time caring for three fabulous children, ages 3 months, 17 months, and 31/2 years. Salary: $125 per week.
TAKE a good hard look at that ad. You've probably seen many like it. If you've used agencies to help you find a job, you've no doubt been sent to interviews with prospective employers who were under the mistaken impression that it's perfectly okay to insist that their nanny also take on the responsibilities of housekeeping.
I ask: Do your employers expect their auto mechanic to style their hair? Do they require their lawyer to cap their teeth? Would they dare insist that their stock broker administer EKG's and pap smears? ... Noooo?
Then why do they expect their nanny to clean their house?
Because the legacy of slavery is alive and well in this country, that's why. And that legacy affects the vast majority of today's nannies, no matter what their race or background.
Sadly, to a great degree this unfortunate situation is the fault of nannies. Yes, ladies, we are guilty! No self-respecting cook, valet, chauffeur, groundskeeper, or housekeeper would allow their employer to ask them to also "watch the kids."
Do you ever wonder why people in the aforementioned professions enjoy more career respect than donannies? Have you ever wondered why most of them also earn much more money than the average nanny earns? Do you believe it's unfair that they earn those higher salaries for performing the duties of one job, while nannies earn less for slaving away over a house and kids?
And need I note that, more than is usually true with nannies, lots of people in those other career categories also receive health and other benefits - and that some of them belong to (dare I say it) unions?
LEARNING THE HARD WAY
During the 20 years prior to starting work as a nanny, I worked as a journalist. I capped my career in that profession as a business and financial news editor at the mighty New York Times. So, yes, I've got an attitude. Mega Big.
When I decided to work as a nanny two years ago, I had little idea what I was getting into. All I knew was that children love me; that even though I don't allow them to get away with stuff, they like being around me. (Probably because I set safe, moral boundaries for them!) All I knew was that I like seeing the look of delight and awe on a child's face when I teach him or her something cool or lovely.
So I took the American Red Cross First Aid and CPR courses, and I was hired by, and agreed to work for, the first couple who interviewed me. At that time, they had a nine-week-old boy. Three weeks later, I happily joined their family when Mom returned to work as a corporate executive.
Because I didn't know any better, I'd agreed to the ubiquitous "light housekeeping chores." That lasted exactly two months. Here's why:
I began to notice that I was getting downright cranky at certain times of the day; that I was very near too exhausted to maintain the patience, good humor, watchfulness, and genuinely loving attitude that are essential to doing an excellent job as a nanny. Then it happened.
One day while I was vacuuming, my charge fell off a bed. As my little hunnie began to slide toward the floor, I slammed down the vacuum cleaner and dived for his tiny body. I still don't know how I did it, but I thank God I was somehow able to catch his little head in my outstretched hands just before he hit the floor (which, by the way, was uncarpeted at that time).
After I called his pediatrician, and his parents, and after I knew for sure that my wee munchkin was absolutely okay, I was able to "relax" and
begin having a hyperventillious freak-out fit.
When I calmed down, I knew it was time to talk to my employers about how dangerous it is to require a nanny to do housework.
They first offered me more money. (This was on top of a raise I'd already received!) I told them I didn't want money; that I get my jollies from loving my job and from doing it well; that I would hate my job, and myself, if doing housework meant ignoring or hurting or being inattentive to their little son in any way, shape, or form.
I asked them whether they knew even one work-at-home mom who has a spotless home.
Think about that. How many people do you know who have children and a clean home? If their home is clean and neat, dad probably pitches in by doing a lot - and I mean a downright megatude - of serious housework. If dad doesn't pitch in and their home is clean and neat, they probably have a housekeeper. Otherwise, it's Tornado Time until the kids are old enough to also do serious housework (if they've been reared and trained well), or until they're old enough to move out and maintain their own sty.
I also asked my employers to imagine what their son was doing while I was busy cleaning house.
Do the housework while the child is napping? Nix that! What if there's more than one child? Most important, imagine how patient, tolerant, alert, and unflappable anyone would be after they've been engaged in physical labor for several hours, and then must interact with a child. (And imagine if the child is sick, tired, hungry, or irritable.)
All this on top of interacting with the child before and after nap time: Taking him out for walks and to play, cooking his meals and cleaning up after that (a nanny ought not leave a filthy kitchen!).
Where's the time - and the crucial loving patience - for teaching the child about all the things that are in that kitchen? For encouraging him to walk and talk? For reading? For teaching how to use a toilet? For teaching to pick up his toys? For teaching through play with paints, puzzles, puppets, and popcorn?
Children demand and crave - nay, they require - multitudinous mountains of love and attention; they need to be held and hugged, cooed at and sung to. They often need undistracted, all-encompassing emotional soothing and reassurance. Otherwise you end up creating a Charlie Manson or a Jeffrey Dahmer.
I maintain that children will not get this all-important patience and loving attention from a nanny who's bogged down by scullery work.
Keep in mind that a work-at-home mom is free to not do housework if she's tired. A "nanny /housekeeper" doesn't have that option. If cleaning house is part of her job description, she cannot blow off that part of her day.
On average, nannies work a 50-hour week. Even without doing housework, it's hard rearing children. I vociferously maintain that it's dangerous to work 10 hours a day without taking a break. And it's especially dangerous, bordering on the morally criminal, to do so if you work with children.
Haven't you seen them on the streets, at the malls, in pediatricians' offices?: "nanny / housekeepers." You can spot them a mile away: Baneful facial expressions. Drag / pulling miserably unhappy little kids behind them, looking for all the world like they're both galloping toward the gulag. Snapping and barking at, and even slapping their charges. (This also goes for physically and emotionally exhausted moms and dads.)
I will not do that to a child. I will not do that to myself. So I told my employers it would be much better to take the additional money they were offering me and use it to hire a housekeeper. God bless 'em, they saw the light. And they could afford it.
The Legacy of Slavery
It is a gross misconception that everybody in the American south owned slaves. It is even a gross misconception that, among people who could afford slaves, most of those who did so owned hundreds or thousands of them.
Among slave-owning households (and among households with indentured servants), there were cooks, maids, deliverymen, field hands, etc. Among household slaves, children were reared and looked after by many people. No one person was responsible for running the house and rearing the children.
In Europe, among families who could afford servants, there were governesses, butlers, upper house maids, kitchen maids, nannies. No one expected nannies to clean the house and rear the children.
So how did it come about that the great majority of people who are looking to hire a nanny in America today expect her to also work as a housekeeper?
Can it be that, thanks to the legacy of slavery and its resulting degradation of black people, these employers believe they're still dealing with slaves and with unenlightened black folks? That because slaves and poor black people once did this work, anyone who does this work today - even a trained, educated white woman - can be treated as a slave, and can be paid slave wages?
Can it be that because women have always earned less money than men, and because nannies are almost exclusively women, employers believe they can get away with paying nannies salaries equal to squat?
And why do employers believe they're doing a nanny a favor by having her live in their home? If you're a live-in nanny, do you live in for your convenience? Or do you live in for the convenience of your employers?
Why do employers of live-in nannies believe they can pay a live-in less money than they'd pay a live-out nanny? Oh!? Because they're housing her, so they don't have to pay her real money? Because they're deducting rent from her pay?
I ask: If an investment banker or a computer programmer stays overnight at his office, does his employer deduct the equivalent of the cost of a night in a hotel room from his salary? Is an investment banker's or a computer programmer's work more important, or more difficult, than the work of parenting children? Hello? Not on planet Earth it ain't! People - this is bogus!!!
What You Can Do
First, if you are one, you can stop being a racial bigot ... right now! Bigotry and racism hurt everybody. If you don't openly object to the mentality that says it's okay to abuse, misuse, and demean other human beings, you're cutting your own throat. Who's to say you're not next?
Refuse, I say RE-FUSE, to work for people who treat you - and pay you - like you're a a slave. Employers, be they office managers, police chiefs, or parents seeking a nanny, will treat you the way you allow them to treat you. Are you allowing yourself to be treated like a slave?
Take a leaf out of Rosa Parks' book. Do you remember Rosa Parks? She's the black woman who refused to give up her bus seat to a white man in Montgomery, Alabama in 1955, setting off the black civil rights movement of this century. I urge all nannies to Just Say No!
Make sure you're trained and educated up the wah-zoo. It is exceedingly wise to have training and education in childcare. But keep in mind that parents are desperate for good nannies; that many of them will jump at the chance to hire any extremely loving, intelligent, educated person who's worked in almost any hard-core, real-deal profession, and who has outstanding, checkable referrences. (They'll even hire journalists - the lowest of the low!)
Training, experience, and education will give you the confidence to talk straight with your employers. They will help you to confidently negotiate your duties and salary, and they'll give you the poise to insist upon a written agreement.
Never forget with whom you're dealing. Anyone who can afford to hire a full-time nanny very likely has a job that requires consummate skill at negotiating, talking straight, and being assertive. In other words, you're dealing with people who are not afraid to talk turkey. They needed to do it in order to advance their careers. So do you!
Do not ever, under any circumstances, work "off the books." When you agree to work off the books, you are not only cheating this nation - you are cheating yourself.
Among other things, by working off the books you are giving up all rights to receive unemployment compensation and disability benefits. What happens if you lose your job and you can't find another one? Worse, what happens if you're injured on the job? Think your employers will take care of you? Think again: Any employer who doesn't withhold taxes is dishonest. Do you really trust a cheat?
By working off the books, you are telling your employers that you, too, are a cheat. How do you think they'll treat you if they know from day one that you're a cheat? Will they trust you? Will they respect your privacy? Agreeing to work off the books is the best way in the world to build your relationship with a new family on shaky ground.
Many nannies who work off the books say they do so because their pay is so low. What these nannies don't understand is that one of the reasons their pay is low is because they work off the books. This self-defeating practice drives down wages throughout the industry.
As as long as there are nannies out there who insist upon working off the books, no one will ever take nannies or the nanny industry seriously. Working off the books is illegal. And employers, as well as lawmakers, will continue to view nannies as criminals - videotaping them, invading their every privacy - as long as working off the books continues to be any kind of norm in this industry.
Never work for the financially challenged.
Hopefully, you've worked hard to establish yourself as a professional. You're no mere baby-sitter. No matter what your age, you are emotionally mature and you're "legal," you are not an au pair. You're educated. You're smart. You're honest. You work hard, and you work well. You've got references that can gratify the CIA and the FBI. Do not allow America's crisis over the lack of affordable childcare to become your personal problem.
Who are you? Saint Mother Mary of the 'Kick Me' Chapel? If they can't afford a housekeeper, they can't afford you!
-----------------------------------------------------
This article is a reprint from the National Association of Nannies newsletter and legitimately reflects the way some nannies feel. Like it or not, nannies deserve a voice even when they say things we don't like or that make us uncomfortable.
What can we learn from this article to be better agencies, employers and nannies. I appreciated many of the responses to Ms.Garnes article but was disapointed by those who seemed to want to stifle healthy debate or a nanny with a strong opinion. If you are a reader who disagrees with Ms. Garnes, that's great. We welcome your comments, concerns and questions. Nevertheless, we support Ms. Garnes right to speak her mind. For those of you who wish to respond we also support your right to support her or "let her have it" if you see fit.
Please post your comments below.
Posted by ilmnct
at 10:45 AM EDT